Sunday, May 13, 2012

Reflecting on Cooperative Learning and Reinforcing Effort


Cooperative Learning:
I have always used some form of cooperative learning in my classrooms, and after reading this chapter and taking the classes I am currently taking, I feel like I have some new tools to try with cooperative learning.  Clearly, things like Google Docs are awesome for cooperative learning; being able to view revision history can help to ensure that all group members are contributing.  There are also many other technologies that can help facilitate cooperative learning, things like wikis, blogs, and other Web 2.0 tools.

One thing I will try as a result of what I have learned is to use a rubric specifically for the groupwork; a rubric like this can help students be reflective, can help keep them focused on being productive group members, and gives them a tool to self-assess and peer-assess.  I think for setting clear expectations for learners in terms of groupwork can only improve the cooperative learning experience for all.  

I also liked the suggestion to use cooperative learning for a variety of purposes and with a variety of group combinations.  There is a chance I will be teaching a 2 hour reading/writing block next year, and I think that having base groups for the whole semester would be a great thing.  These groups could be used for “morning meeting” type activities, home groups for jigsaw activities, revising and editing, etc.  These base groups wouldn’t be used for everything, though, and I think that is important.  These base groups could give the students a sense of security, a “home base” in class and perhaps be a place to encourage reflection.
Reinforcing Effort:
In my school, teachers are required to give students standard effort and conduct comments on their report cards, in addition to a grade and individualized comments.  It is interesting to see how different students and parents react to them; some view the effort and conduct comments as even more important than grades, and some skim right over them.  As we review our grading practices, we have been brainstorming a rubric for effort, and I was interested to see one right in the chapter.  Another thing to bring to the discussion!

This section also makes me think of an article I read about praise and how it is impacting our students’ willingness – or unwillingness – to try.  Students who were praised for outcomes, like grades, become less and less likely to try things they found difficult, whereas students who were praised for their effort were more likely to attempt new things, attempt more difficult things, and be willing to fail in order to learn something new.  I think there is an important lesson in this for both parents and teachers.  We need to create learners who are willing to try new things and who are willing to risk mistakes in order to achieve greater learning and greater success.

Thursday, May 10, 2012

The Four Roles of an Online Teacher


After reading about the four roles of an online teacher, I definitely think I could predict several strengths and weaknesses if I were teaching an online course.  I think I would be pretty good at the “instructor” role; I love to design activities and integrate technology, and I think if I had time to really focus on the writing of a course, I could being building an engaging and challenging curriculum that would work in an online setting.  Weaknesses?  I would need to focus on time management and building schedules to really give constructive feedback, timely responses, and take care of some of the business that might need less thought in a face-to-face, traditional setting.  Another potential weakness is that I can only effectively troubleshoot PCs; I have very little experience with the Apple world.  Here is a more comprehensive look at all four roles:
Role of an Online Teacher
Description
Skills I Need to Improve
Strategies to Improve Skills
Instructorfacilitate student learning through engaging and challenging activities
  • structuring class to reflect formative, benchmark, and summative assesments
  • structuring class so both synchronous and asynchronous activities have purpose and meaning
  • take time to properly write curriculum and design course, altering traditional learning activities to those that are better suited for e-learning
  • network with other online instructors to learn what activities and strategies work for them
Social Directorfoster synchronous and asynchronous discussions in both large and small group settings
  • asking questions that foster discussion and lead to deeper inquiry
  • giving enough wait time to ensure thoughtful response
  • be a reflective practitioner and take notes on what works and doesn’t work after classes and courses
  • focus on prompts to encourage discussion
Technicianintegrate a variety of technological tools and programs into course curriculum and assist students with technical issues
  • keep up-to-date with Web 2.0 tools
  • understand a variety of different computers, browsers, etc., so I can help students
  • search out online tutorials, webinars, and experts from which to learn
  • continue to develop PLN
  • subscribe to professional resources to help keep current
Program Managerestablish classwork and groupwork norms and guide student progress through coursework
  • time management
  • prompt, helpful response to email and feedback for homework and projects
  • network with other online instructors to learn what activities and strategies work for them
  • spend time developing calendar and blocking out time for structured online office hours

Monday, May 7, 2012

Institutions Vs. Collaboration


Change is hard.  That is what I am feeling after watching Clay Shirky’s TED talk on institutions vs. collaborations.  Being part of an institution, it is difficult to imagine (or at least, it is difficult to WANT to imagine) a future where institutions have changed so drastically.  However, if I am honest, my job role is already undergoing this change…library media specialists must embrace their changing role or say goodbye to their jobs.  The institution of the school library no longer looks the same as it did as recently as five years ago; librarians who are embracing more collaborative environments and technologies are not only revitalizing their library spaces and programs, but also leading the change to this collaborative model for their schools.

The institution of school is also already changing, as evidenced by virtual schools and blended learning models.  Although I don’t believe the institution of school could ever completely go away, some of the constructs and constraints of the current model could definitely evolve by using a more collaborative model.  For instance, by using online and blended learning models, the four walls of the classroom can disappear or be used more infrequently.  This could mean significant cost savings.  Also, the model of the traditional school year and of same-age classrooms could become more flexible.  Another example could be the informational resources used: traditional textbooks could be replaced with free or low-cost internet-based resources.  With the abundance of quality primary and secondary sources available online and the collaborative efforts of educator and field professionals sharing knowledge, information, and best practices, traditional textbooks would become obsolete.

Tools like Flickr, Twitter, and Wikipedia prove how powerful the volunteer effort of collaboration can be, overcoming many institutional constraints.  It is difficult to imagine the institutions going away, but it is definitely exciting to see the possibilities that a more collaborative model can bring.  I can only hope that I (and other educators) have the energy to keep up with the changes that this model might mean for our classrooms, our schools, and our careers.

Saturday, May 5, 2012

Comparison of Online Mapping Tools

Looking at online mapping tools was interesting.  There are definitely more available than I knew about.  We use Inspiration in our school, but definitely not to the degree it could be used.  It seems very easy to forget about it in the day-to-day workings in a classroom.  

I like all three of the online tools I examined (bubbl.us, MindMeister, and Exploratree),  I was prepared to like Exploratree the least, because at first glance, it seemed the least collaborative.  However, this is not the case; like the other tools, it can be used collaboratively and can even be posted for feedback and review.  Exploratree might be the best to use for collaborative purposes in education because of the fact that it is free.

It will be interesting to see if I would use these in a classroom; I have always been a “make-it-myself” kind of teacher.  I feel that with the collaborative possibilities of Google Docs, I still could make my own mind maps or graphic organizers and share these with students just as easily as using most of these tools.

bubbl.usMindMeisterexploratree
Creator/
Company/
Organization
  • bubbl.us
  • Meister Labs
  • Futurelab
  • Ease of Use
    • easy to learn
    • clear getting started and help guides
  • extensive online help
  • tutorials available
  • clear help guides
  • video tutorials available
  • Features
    • can embed on other websites
    • can choose to share as a collaborative or read only doc
    • clean interface
    • app for Google Chrome
    • Facebook page provides many usage tips
  • change history is saved
  • change history can be played back
  • mobile apps for Apple and Android devices
  • stored online
  • all users access same doc
  • clean interface
  • Geistesblitz Widgets lets you add ideas to a default map from anywhere
  • connects with Twitter
  • offline mode
  • connects with Google Docs
  • Facebook page provides ideas for use
  • developed with school and classroom learning in mind
  • pre-made or create-your-own templates
  • can be printed out or filled out on website
  • can be revealed in a sequence to help guide thinking process
  • can comment on other’s guides or submit your own for comments
  • Number/
    Types of Organizers
    • create-your-own, no pre-existing templates
  • Over 35 templates in categories such as education, business, entertainment, life, technology, etc.
  • Over 25 templates
  • Collaborative Possibilities
    • share through email or direct link
    • can collaborate with other bubbl.us users
  • share through email or direct link
  • real-time collaboration with color-coded changes
  • live chat features
  • share through email or direct link
  • Cost
    • with 50% educational discount, it is $3 / month or $29 / year
  • 3 free maps Personal:$4.99 / month
  • Academic pricing: http://www.mindmeister.com/academic
  • Free
  • Drawbacks
    • Collaborators have to bubbl.us users
    • Cost prohibitive to use in a whole class setting
  • Cost prohibitive to use in a whole class or school setting
  • not as connected to other collaborative web tools or social media sites